|
IMPACT ON HEALTH
Many Believe God
Trumps Doctors
When it comes to
saving lives, God trumps doctors for many Americans
An eye-opening
survey revealed widespread belief that divine intervention
can revive dying patients. And, researchers said, doctors
"need to be prepared to deal with families who are waiting
for a miracle."
More than half of
randomly surveyed adults — 57 percent —said God's
intervention could save a family member even if physicians
declared treatment would be futile. And nearly
three-quarters said patients have a right to demand such
treatment.
When asked to
imagine their own relatives being gravely ill or injured,
nearly 20 percent of doctors and other medical workers said
God could reverse a hopeless outcome.
"Sensitivity to
this belief will promote development of a trusting
relationship" with patients and their families, according to
researchers. That trust, they said, is needed to help
doctors explain objective, overwhelming scientific evidence
showing that continued treatment would be worthless.
Pat Loder, a
Milford, Michigan woman whose two young children were killed
in a 1991 car crash, said she clung to a belief that God
would intervene when things looked hopeless.
"When you're a
parent and you're standing over the body of your child who
you think is dying . . . you have to have that belief,"
Loder said.
While doctors
should be prepared to deal with those beliefs, they also
shouldn't "sugarcoat" the truth about a patient's condition,
Loder said.
Being honest in a
sensitive way helps family members make excruciating
decisions about whether to let dying patients linger, or
allow doctors to turn off life-prolonging equipment so that
organs can be donated, Loder said.
Loder was driving
when a speeding motorcycle slammed into the family's car.
Both children were rushed unconscious to hospitals, and
Loder says she believes doctors did everything they could.
They were not able to revive her 5-year-old son; soon after
her 8-year-old daughter was declared brain dead.
She said her
beliefs about divine intervention have changed.
"I have become more
of a realist," she said. "I know that none of us are immune
from anything."
Loder was not
involved in the survey, which appears in Monday's Archives
of Surgery.
It involved 1,000
U.S. adults randomly selected to answer questions by
telephone about their views on end-of-life medical care.
They were surveyed in 2005, along with 774 doctors, nurses
and other medical workers who responded to mailed questions.
Survey questions
mostly dealt with untimely deaths from trauma such as
accidents and violence. These deaths are often particularly
tough on relatives because they are more unexpected than
deaths from lingering illnesses such as cancer, and the
patients tend to be younger.
Dr. Lenworth
Jacobs, a University of Connecticut surgery professor and
trauma chief at Hartford Hospital, was the lead author.
He said trauma
treatment advances have allowed patients who previously
would have died at the scene to survive longer. That shift
means hospital trauma specialists "are much more heavily
engaged in the death process," he said.
Jacobs said he
frequently meets people who think God will save their dying
loved ones and who want medical procedures to continue.
"You can't say,
'That's nonsense.' You have to respect that" and try to show
them X-rays, CAT scans and other medical evidence indicating
death is imminent, he said.
Relatives need to
know that "it's not that you don't want a miracle to happen,
it's just that is not going to happen today with this
patient," he said.
Families
occasionally persist and hospitals have gone to court
seeking to stop medical treatment doctors believe is futile,
but such cases are quite rare.
Dr. Michael Sise,
trauma medical director at Scripps Mercy Hospital in San
Diego, called the study "a great contribution" to one of the
most intense issues doctors face.
Sise, a Catholic
doctor working in a Catholic hospital, said miracles don't
happen when medical evidence shows death is near.
"That's just not a
realistic situation," he said.
Sise recalled a
teenager severely injured in a gang beating who died soon
afterward at his hospital.
The mother
"absolutely did not want to withdraw" medical equipment
despite the severity of her child's brain injuries, which
ensured the child would never wake up, Sise said. "The mom
was playing religious tapes in the room, and obviously was
very focused on looking for a miracle."
Claudia McCormick,
a nurse and trauma program director at Duke University
Hospital, said she also has never seen that kind of miracle.
But her niece's recovery after being hit by a boat while
inner-tubing earlier this year came close.
The boat backed
into her and its propeller "caught her in the side of the
head. She had no pulse when they pulled her out of the
water," McCormick said.
Doctors at the
hospital where she was airlifted said "it really doesn't
look good." And while it never reached the point where
withdrawing lifesaving equipment was discussed, McCormick
recalled one of her doctors saying later: "God has plans for
this child. I never thought she'd be here."
Like many
hospitals, Duke uses a team approach to help relatives deal
with dying trauma victims, enlisting social workers, grief
counselors and chaplains to work with doctors and nurses.
If the family still
says, "We just can't shut that machine off, then, you know
what, we can't shut that machine off," McCormick said.
"Sometimes," she
said, "you might have a family that's having a hard time and
it might take another day, and that's OK." (AP)

|